I came across an
interesting BPS Research Digest post which looked at a study by Belgian psychologist
Saartje Cromheecke.
Working with a
Belgian technology company Cromheecke’s team sent out a real job opportunity to 1,997
potential applicants. Half got the standard email we all see every day and the
other half got a hand-written postcard showing a coffee mug and a blank daily
agenda. The email and postcard message featured the same layout and included
the same written information and content about the job vacancy. Both type of
applicants now had the same chance to apply.
Over all 62 of
the those contacted applied for the job. But 82% of them had received the
postcard, just 18% had received the email. Put another way, only 1% of those
emailed actually applied for the job compared with 5% of those who received a
postcard. Follow up research also suggested that respondents to the postcard
tended to be better educated, consistent with the researchers' prediction that
a recruitment message sent via a "strange" medium will be more likely
to grab the attention of better-qualified personnel who aren't actively looking
for new opportunities.
The BPS post
does make the important point that Cromheecke's team aren't saying that
postcards will always be the answer. Rather, "this field experiment puts
forth 'media strangeness' as a more general evidence-based principle, which
recruiters might take into account when selecting media for communicating job
postings."
Recruitment
aside, this could also play a role in other customer or client contact situations. Would
potential targets respond better to a postcard or some other ‘strange media’
than an email? Would you be better off sending a special offer on a cup, coaster,
postcard? The ‘strange media’ does not have to be the last word in graphic design,
it just has to be different and convey the necessary information.
No comments:
Post a Comment