In work, some managers have
a tendency to assign a problem or issue to a specific subordinate. It literally
becomes ‘their problem’ and it’s up to them to solve it. Some would see this
approach as one that encourages responsibility and ownership of the task in
hand. In other words, if you make someone directly accountable, they will be
more motivated and perhaps more effective in coming up with a solution.
Some research however casts
doubt on this approach. Being too close to a problem or being personally
involved in it can affect our ability to come up with creative solutions. This
is based on an idea called the "Construal Level Theory" - the notion that distance from a problem provokes a more abstract thinking style.
Evan Polman and Kyle Emich
at New York University examined how we are more capable of mental novelty when
thinking on behalf of strangers than for ourselves. They conducted
four studies involving hundreds of undergrads.
In one study they found that participants drew more original aliens for a story to be written by someone else than for a story they were to write themselves. In another study, participants thought of more original gift ideas for an unknown student completely unrelated to themselves, as opposed to one who they were told shared their same birth month.
In one study they found that participants drew more original aliens for a story to be written by someone else than for a story they were to write themselves. In another study, participants thought of more original gift ideas for an unknown student completely unrelated to themselves, as opposed to one who they were told shared their same birth month.
When it came to problem
solving the trend continued. Participants were given a tower puzzle. They were
asked to explain how one could escape a tower by cutting a rope that was only
half as long as the tower was high. (The solution is to divide the rope
lengthwise into two thinner strips and then tied them together). Participants
were more likely to solve the problem if they imagined someone else trapped in
the tower, rather than themselves.
This could explain why we
sometimes surprise ourselves when giving advice or solutions to others. We are
more likely to be creative and think in an abstract way when sorting out
someone else’s problem rather than our own. This could impact on how we assign
problems (like the tower puzzle) to co-workers. Perhaps we could construct the
task so that they see it as someone else’s problem but one they are asked to
help solve.
Next time you have a problem to delegate, try and create some
healthy distance between the conundrum and the person coming up with the
solution. You might see improved results.
No comments:
Post a Comment